The streaming wars have entered a new phase, and Netflix finds itself fighting on two distinct fronts simultaneously. While Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management has re-established a significant stake in the company, the platform is also locked in an escalating tug-of-war with YouTube over the industry’s most valuable commodity: creators with loyal audiences.
Ackman’s Second Act
Between August 12 and 14, Pershing Square disclosed a new position of 3.15 million shares, representing 4.9 percent of the fund’s portfolio as of June 30. The move marks Ackman’s return to a stock that burned him in 2022, when he exited the position at a loss.
In its filing, Pershing Square struck a confident tone, declaring that Netflix has “effectively won the streaming war.” The fund anticipates double-digit revenue growth, with content costs expected to rise more slowly than revenue—a dynamic that should continue expanding margins. The current valuation, according to the fund’s assessment, represents a significant discount to intrinsic worth.
This institutional vote of confidence arrives as the stock trades at 68.47 euros, having climbed 14 percent over the past 30 days. The relative strength index of 60.5 points to meaningful buying interest without signaling overbought conditions. Thursday’s closing price of 68.58 euros reflected a marginal 0.1 percent dip, while the week-on-week gain stood at 1.5 percent. The company’s market capitalization now hovers around 270.92 billion euros.
The Creator Economy Clash
The investment news, however, is only half the story. Behind the scenes, Netflix has been aggressively courting YouTube’s biggest stars—a strategy that has forced YouTube to respond with unprecedented financial firepower.
According to Bloomberg reporting, YouTube is now offering popular channels multi-million-dollar packages in exchange for exclusivity commitments. The payments flow through two mechanisms: direct financing of certain formats and revenue-sharing arrangements on major brand deals. Negotiations are reportedly close to completion with several partners, though nothing has been finalized.
YouTube has also issued warnings to creators who continue publishing on both platforms simultaneously: they risk exclusion from marketing campaigns, platform events, and their share of select brand partnerships.
The conflict traces back to Netflix’s non-exclusive contracts, which allow creators to publish content on both platforms simultaneously. Alan Chikin Chow and Nick DiGiovanni have already signed on, and Netflix is in talks with dozens more channels and formats, including the celebrity talk show “Hot Ones.”
Netflix’s pitch is straightforward: creators receive additional compensation for content they’re already producing, plus access to more than 325 million subscribers worldwide. The strategy has already produced notable wins—the comedy podcast “Kill Tony” ended its twelve-year continuous YouTube presence to move to Netflix.
A Strategic Reckoning at YouTube
For YouTube CEO Neal Mohan, the escalating competition represents a significant policy shift. His previous assumption held that creators publishing on rival platforms would ultimately drive additional viewers back to YouTube. But according to Bloomberg, Mohan and his team concluded in recent weeks that the growing volume of dual-publishing has become a genuine problem.
The concern is fundamentally commercial. When a video runs simultaneously on both platforms, YouTube can no longer credibly sell advertisers on the exclusivity of its content.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying Netflix?
The stakes are considerable. YouTube now reaches more viewers on television screens than any other streaming service, while Netflix licenses YouTube formats like “CoComelon” to attract younger audiences. On revenue, YouTube leads in 2025: its combined advertising and subscription income exceeds $60 billion, surpassing Netflix’s earnings for the same year. Over the past four years, YouTube says it has distributed more than $100 billion to creators.
This isn’t YouTube’s first rodeo with defensive payments—the company previously used financial incentives to keep creators from defecting to the now-defunct startup competitor Vessel.
Advertising Momentum Builds
The creator battle unfolds against a backdrop of robust advertising performance. On August 10, Netflix announced the completion of its US upfront negotiations for the 2026 advertising year, with ad bookings nearly doubling year-over-year—matching the company’s own expectations.
Demand was particularly strong for sponsorship of the 2027 Women’s World Cup: all game sponsorships and nearly all available advertising inventory within the broadcasts sold out. Additionally, the Netflix Ads Suite became the first platform to receive Media Rating Council accreditation for processing and measuring video impressions across connected TV, mobile apps, and desktop web in the United States.
Mixed Signals in the Numbers
The recent investor activity follows second-quarter results released July 16. Earnings per share came in at $0.80, beating expectations, while revenue grew 13 percent to $12.56 billion. The outlook, however, disappointed: Netflix guided to 11.7 percent revenue growth for the third quarter, reaching $12.86 billion—below the roughly $13 billion analysts had anticipated.
Despite the cautious forecast, the company demonstrated aggressive capital deployment. Netflix repurchased $4.7 billion of its own stock in the second quarter, the largest quarterly buyback in company history. First-half buybacks totaled $5.9 billion, with $27 billion remaining under authorization.
Content Pipeline and Industry Shifts
On the programming front, the fifth and final season of “Outer Banks” premiered Thursday. Meanwhile, the proposed Paramount–Warner Bros. Discovery merger continues to generate industry discussion—an analysis from CVL Economics and the Department of Economic Opportunity projects up to 4,500 film and TV jobs could disappear in Los Angeles County alone over the next three years.
Netflix’s February decision not to match Paramount’s higher bid for Warner Bros. Discovery now looks increasingly prudent, allowing the company to focus on its advertising business, share repurchases, and organic growth.
A minor insider transaction—board member Richard Barton’s August 5 sale of 2,160 shares worth approximately $162,216—pales in comparison to the Pershing Square position and does little to dampen the generally positive tone of recent developments.
Whether Netflix’s non-exclusive creator model can withstand YouTube’s more aggressive retention tactics will ultimately be decided in the coming months by hard metrics: subscriber growth and engagement figures on both platforms.
Ad
Netflix Stock: Buy or Sell?! New Netflix Analysis from August 21 delivers the answer:
The latest Netflix figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for Netflix investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from August 21.
Netflix: Buy or sell? Read more here...
