In a move that appears counterintuitive to its current success, IBM has confirmed significant workforce reductions despite posting robust quarterly results and achieving stock gains exceeding 35% year-to-date. The technology giant’s decision to eliminate thousands of positions while demonstrating strong financial health raises questions about CEO Arvind Krishna’s strategic direction as the company positions itself against competitors like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google in the artificial intelligence arena.
Strategic Workforce Reductions Target International Operations
On November 4, 2025, IBM announced it would be reducing its global workforce by a “low-single-digit percentage.” With approximately 270,000 employees worldwide, this translates to between 2,700 and 8,100 positions being eliminated. The restructuring will primarily affect international locations, while United States operations are expected to maintain stable employment levels.
The company characterized the move as part of regular workforce assessment, stating they “routinely review our staffing levels and make adjustments as necessary.” Behind this corporate language lies a significant strategic shift toward higher-margin business segments.
AI-Driven Transformation Reshapes IBM’s Focus
CEO Arvind Krishna’s vision centers on transitioning from low-margin infrastructure services toward highly profitable software and artificial intelligence solutions. This strategic pivot comes despite strong performance across multiple divisions: the software unit grew by 10% in the third quarter of 2025, while infrastructure services expanded by 17%. The AI portfolio has particularly flourished, reaching $9.5 billion—representing a $2 billion increase within just months.
The organizational transformation carries substantial operational changes. Krishna previously indicated that AI agents have already replaced approximately 200 human resources positions. Resources freed through automation are being redirected toward sales and software development functions. The current workforce reduction follows this established pattern of automating where feasible and reinvesting savings into growth areas like hybrid cloud computing and Red Hat platforms.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying IBM?
Market Response and Financial Context
Investors responded to the announcement with caution, sending IBM shares approximately 2% lower on Tuesday. Despite this reaction, the stock remains one of this year’s standout performers, having advanced more than 37% since January and trading just below its 52-week high of €268.55. This represents substantial appreciation from its price of around €190 just one year earlier.
Financial analysts present divided perspectives on IBM’s direction. While Erste Group downgraded the stock to “Hold,” citing below-average revenue growth concerns, other firms maintain price targets reaching $350. The company’s gross margin recently climbed to 57.3%, indicating operational strength. For full-year 2025, IBM projects free cash flow of $14 billion and currency-adjusted revenue growth exceeding 5%.
Industry-Wide Trend Toward Automation
IBM’s workforce strategy reflects broader industry patterns. Amazon recently announced plans to cut 14,000 positions, while Meta eliminated 600 roles within its AI division. Across the technology sector, companies are simultaneously pursuing automation initiatives and efficiency improvements while making massive investments in AI infrastructure.
The effectiveness of IBM’s approach will face significant scrutiny on January 28, 2026, when the company releases fourth-quarter results. These figures will reveal whether the workforce restructuring delivers the intended margin improvements or represents an overly aggressive transformation strategy.
Ad
IBM Stock: Buy or Sell?! New IBM Analysis from November 5 delivers the answer:
The latest IBM figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for IBM investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from November 5.
IBM: Buy or sell? Read more here...
