The fuel-cell maker’s stock tells two stories at once: a record-breaking quarter that shattered expectations, and a legal overhang that has knocked the shares more than a third off their June peak. On Monday, the equity traded at €193.40, up 2 percent on the day, yet still 37.31 percent below the 52-week high of €308.50 touched just two months ago.
That gap between operational momentum and market performance has produced one of the more striking analyst disagreements on Wall Street this earnings season. Price targets on Bloom Energy now range from $176 to $350 — a spread wide enough to suggest the Street is pricing in two entirely different companies.
A Quarter That Rewrote the Playbook
The numbers themselves left little room for quibbling. Bloom Energy reported second-quarter revenue of $1.065 billion on July 28, the first time the company has crossed the billion-dollar threshold in a single quarter. Product revenue surged 215 percent year over year to $935.4 million, while non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.78 nearly doubled the $0.40 consensus estimate. The beat marked the fourth consecutive quarter of outperformance.
Management responded by lifting full-year 2026 revenue guidance to a range of $3.9 billion to $4.2 billion. More striking was the upgrade to non-GAAP operating income guidance, which jumped from a prior $425 million to $450 million range to a new $800 million to $900 million band.
The engine behind this acceleration is unmistakable: electricity demand from AI data centers. Bloom now serves nearly two dozen AI-infrastructure customers with roughly 250 megawatts of capacity — a figure that sat near zero just two years ago. The roster includes American Electric Power, Brookfield, Equinix, Nebius and Oracle.
The Bull Case, Articulated
Evercore ISI has emerged as the most visible defender of the stock. Analyst Nicholas Amicucci reaffirmed an Outperform rating with a $350 price target on August 7, the highest on the Street, following news of an expanded partnership with MiTAC Computing Technology. Bloom will supply fuel-cell systems to power an islanded microgrid at MiTAC’s AI server manufacturing campus in Fremont, California.
Evercore’s argument rests on the breadth of Bloom’s AI-infrastructure reach, which the firm believes is underappreciated. Mizuho Securities similarly upgraded the stock from Neutral to Outperform on July 30, though it trimmed its target to $242 from $285, citing growing confidence in AI-driven growth. Morgan Stanley reaffirmed Overweight with a $310 target on July 29, modeling an additional 100 megawatts of deliveries in the second half of the year.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying Bloom Energy?
Investors will get another data point on August 12, when Nebius Group — a key Bloom partner in AI infrastructure — reports quarterly results. The print is widely viewed as a proxy for demand in the data-center segment.
The Skeptics Counter
Yet the post-earnings response from several houses was notable for its caution, even as they acknowledged the strength of the quarter. JPMorgan Chase cut its target from $346 to $314 on July 29 while holding Overweight. Truist Financial lowered its target to $218 from $250, Roth Capital to $225, and BMO Capital Markets to $227 from $279 — all maintaining their existing ratings.
Wells Fargo was the most aggressive, slashing its target from $217 to $176 with an Equal Weight stance, citing more conservative assumptions for the post-2030 period. Jefferies cut to $188 from $246. The pattern — upgraded ratings alongside reduced targets — reads less as doubt about the underlying business and more as a recalibration of a valuation multiple that expanded rapidly during the stock’s run.
Legal Clouds and Insider Signals
The share price’s slide from its June peak — roughly 38.54 percent at Friday’s close, when the stock finished at €189.60, down 4.63 percent — cannot be blamed on analyst caution alone. A class action filed roughly a month ago, based on a Hunterbrook Media short-seller report alleging undisclosed reliance on Chinese-sourced scandium, has weighed on sentiment. Since that report, the stock has fallen about 14.8 percent.
The legal pressure has intensified. Levi & Korsinsky filed a lawsuit on Saturday alleging the company made false statements between February 27, 2025 and July 8, 2026 regarding its dependence on scandium from China. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP filed a separate action on Thursday in the Nevins v. Bloom Energy Corporation case before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status is September 28.
Despite the overhang, institutional interest has surfaced. Assenagon Asset Management purchased 233,020 shares on Saturday, and an automated system added the stock to its “Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy)” category on August 7 — though that signal arrives amid ongoing litigation and a wide dispersion of analyst targets.
The stock still trades 19.75 percent above its 200-day moving average, suggesting the longer-term uptrend remains intact despite the recent correction. For now, Bloom Energy presents a study in contradiction: a company whose operating results have exceeded virtually every forecast, trading at a valuation that increasingly reflects legal uncertainty and questions about the durability of AI-driven power demand. The $174 spread between the lowest and highest price targets captures that tension precisely.
Ad
Bloom Energy Stock: Buy or Sell?! New Bloom Energy Analysis from August 10 delivers the answer:
The latest Bloom Energy figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for Bloom Energy investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from August 10.
Bloom Energy: Buy or sell? Read more here...
