Greg Abel has never been one to sugarcoat the operational frictions that come with running a sprawling conglomerate. But his latest comments to CNBC reveal a tension at the heart of Berkshire Hathaway’s energy ambitions: the same AI boom that is driving record electricity demand is also generating fierce resistance from the communities being asked to host the infrastructure.
“There is a lot more pushback in the communities across the U.S.,” Abel said, acknowledging that municipal opposition is increasingly complicating the buildout of data centers. The admission adds a sobering counterpoint to the enthusiasm he expressed just days earlier when explaining Berkshire’s multibillion-dollar bet on Alphabet.
A Conditional Courtship of Hyperscalers
Berkshire Hathaway Energy wants hyperscale data center operators as customers — but not at any cost. Abel made the company’s position unambiguous: Berkshire is interested in supplying power “if there was no impact to the rates of our other customers.” In other words, residential and commercial ratepayers should not be forced to subsidize the grid upgrades needed to serve energy-hungry AI facilities.
That conditionality speaks to a broader dilemma facing utilities across the country. Demand for computing power is surging, yet permitting hurdles and grassroots opposition can stall projects for years. For Berkshire, the path forward requires threading a needle between growth and social license.
The Growth Thesis Remains Intact
Despite the local headwinds, Abel is not walking back his demand forecast. He reiterated his expectation that AI-related electricity consumption could climb by as much as 50 percent over the next five years — a projection that underpins Berkshire’s strategic positioning.
That outlook helps explain the roughly $10 billion additional investment Berkshire made in Alphabet about three months ago, a decision Abel made alongside Warren Buffett. The rationale, as he framed it, centers on Google’s standing as a “significant player” in the AI market. Reuters reported that the purchases have propelled Alphabet to the position of third-largest equity holding in Berkshire’s portfolio — a shift first visible in the conglomerate’s latest 13F filing, which showed roughly $17 billion worth of Alphabet shares acquired during the second quarter.
The energy division’s recent performance lends credibility to the thesis. Operating earnings at Berkshire Hathaway Energy jumped 27 percent year over year in the second quarter, reaching $891 million.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying Berkshire Hathaway?
Tokyo’s Rising Rates Don’t Rattle the Playbook
Abel also used the same conversation to address Berkshire’s stakes in Japan’s five major trading houses. With the country’s 10-year government bond yield touching a 30-year high above 3 percent, some investors might expect the conglomerate to reconsider its financing strategy. Abel pushed back on that notion, describing the current environment as manageable for the trading houses and reiterating that funding costs in Japan remain “relatively moderate.”
That assessment matters because Berkshire has financed its Japanese positions through yen-denominated bond issuance — a strategy that only works if borrowing costs stay attractive. The Wall Street Journal reported that Abel continues to view the trading house stakes as appealing, signaling no imminent change to the approach.
A Broader Pattern of Abel’s Stewardship
The twin endorsements — of Alphabet and Japan — come as Abel increasingly steps into the role of public capital allocator, a function long dominated by Buffett. The shift has been visible beyond portfolio moves. Berkshire completed its $6.8 billion acquisition of homebuilder Taylor Morrison back in July, a deal widely interpreted as a bet on the U.S. housing market under Abel’s direction.
The conglomerate’s financial foundation remains solid. Second-quarter net income came in at $25.7 billion, with operating earnings of $13.0 billion. First-half operating results totaled $24.3 billion, and Berkshire repurchased roughly $4.5 billion of its own stock during the quarter.
The Market’s Measured Response
Investors have yet to show much excitement about Abel’s commentary. The stock closed Thursday at €655,500, up a modest 0.1 percent on the day. Over the trailing 30 days, shares have slipped 2.7 percent, though they remain 2.9 percent higher year to date. The current price sits 4.4 percent below the 52-week high of €686,000, reached on August 10.
For shareholders, the bigger takeaway may be the emerging clarity of Berkshire’s capital allocation philosophy under Abel: AI-driven growth through Alphabet, dependable cash flows from Japan, and selective acquisitions in real estate. It is a coherent narrative — one that gives the conglomerate a sharper identity as it transitions away from its Buffett-centric era, even as the practical limits of that strategy play out in town halls and zoning hearings across America.
Ad
Berkshire Hathaway Stock: Buy or Sell?! New Berkshire Hathaway Analysis from September 4 delivers the answer:
The latest Berkshire Hathaway figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for Berkshire Hathaway investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from September 4.
Berkshire Hathaway: Buy or sell? Read more here...
